Read Option

Is Josh Jacobs for Rachaad White fair?

Josh Jacobs and Rachaad White have been on opposite sides of 28 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

Most of those were larger deals with other pieces attached. 2 of them were straight up: Josh Jacobs for Rachaad White, nothing else changing hands.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 5 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 5 of those 5 times it was the Rachaad White side (0 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Josh Jacobs as the more valuable of the two.

28
Deals they were both in
2
Straight up, one for one
0 / 5
One side sweetened: Josh Jacobs / Rachaad White

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Josh Jacobs prices at 759 and Rachaad White at 281, so the market currently rates Josh Jacobs about 2.7x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-09-04.

Grade Josh Jacobs for Rachaad White now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Josh JacobsWent with Rachaad White
2026-09-08-79%D'Andre SwiftTravis Etienne, Anthony Richardson
2026-08-31+144%1 3rd
2026-07-18+89%1 2nd
2026-06-12+96%1 2nd, 1 3rd
2025-10-30+109%Rashid ShaheedJalen McMillan, Jaxson Dart
2025-05-20-72%Will Shipley, Jalen McMillan, Xavier Worthy, 8 more, 1 3rdSam LaPorta, MarShawn Lloyd, Malachi Corley, 9 more, 1 3rd, 1 later pick
2025-02-18+41%Alvin Kamara, Terry McLaurin, 1 1st, 1 2ndJauan Jennings, Puka Nacua
2024-11-13+58%James Conner, DeVonta Smith1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rd
2024-10-30-4%Keon Coleman, Alexander Mattison
2024-10-22-63%Kareem HuntJayden Reed

Read each row as: Josh Jacobs, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Rachaad White plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Josh Jacobs; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 28, the whole-deal value gap runs -4.8% from the side that received Josh Jacobs, so the side ending up with Rachaad White has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Josh Jacobs for Rachaad White fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 28 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Josh Jacobs trade · Every Rachaad White trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Research · Privacy · Terms