Read Option

Is Mark Andrews for Michael Pittman fair?

Mark Andrews and Michael Pittman have been on opposite sides of 24 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

Most of those were larger deals with other pieces attached. 1 of them were straight up: Mark Andrews for Michael Pittman, nothing else changing hands.

In 3 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, split 0 to 3 between the Mark Andrews side and the Michael Pittman side. That is too close, and too small a sample, to call either player the more valuable.

24
Deals they were both in
1
Straight up, one for one
0 / 3
One side sweetened: Mark Andrews / Michael Pittman

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Mark Andrews prices at 407 and Michael Pittman at 1,819, so the market currently rates Michael Pittman about 4.5x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Mark Andrews for Michael Pittman now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Mark AndrewsWent with Michael Pittman
2025-07-03-14%Michael Wilson, Marvin Harrison, Ryan Flournoy, 11 moreChris Rodriguez, Rashee Rice, Luke Schoonmaker, 11 more, 1 2nd
2025-06-18+22%Marquise Brown, Kyle Pitts, 1 2ndChuba Hubbard
2025-05-28+109%1 1st1 2nd
2025-05-20+36%Terry McLaurin, Kenneth WalkerD'Andre Swift, Travis Etienne, Kyle Pitts, 1 2nd
2024-11-26+16%Derrick HenryCade Otton, Zach Charbonnet, 1 3rd, 3 later picks
2024-11-14-90%Deebo Samuel, Tee HigginsBen Sinnott, Marvin Harrison, 1 1st, 1 2nd, 2 later picks
2024-11-07-69%DeAndre Hopkins1 2nd, 1 3rd
2024-08-21-34%James Conner, Diontae Johnson, Darnell Mooney1 1st, 1 2nd
2024-06-17-10%Michael Wilson, Rashid ShaheedCade Otton, Dontayvion Wicks
2024-05-07-23%

Read each row as: Mark Andrews, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Michael Pittman plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Mark Andrews; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 24, the whole-deal value gap runs +19.0% from the side that received Mark Andrews, so the side ending up with Mark Andrews has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Mark Andrews for Michael Pittman fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 24 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Mark Andrews trade · Every Michael Pittman trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms