Read Option

Is Mark Andrews for T.J. Hockenson fair?

Mark Andrews and T.J. Hockenson have been on opposite sides of 96 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

Most of those were larger deals with other pieces attached. 2 of them were straight up: Mark Andrews for T.J. Hockenson, nothing else changing hands.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 18 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 14 of those 18 times it was the T.J. Hockenson side (4 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Mark Andrews as the more valuable of the two.

96
Deals they were both in
2
Straight up, one for one
4 / 14
One side sweetened: Mark Andrews / T.J. Hockenson

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Mark Andrews prices at 402 and T.J. Hockenson at 185, so the market currently rates Mark Andrews about 2.2x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-09-04.

Grade Mark Andrews for T.J. Hockenson now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Mark AndrewsWent with T.J. Hockenson
2025-11-16-46%1 2nd1 2nd
2025-10-17+66%A.J. Brown, D'Andre Swift1 1st, 1 2nd
2025-03-31-16%Dak Prescott, 1 2nd1 1st
2024-11-16+75%Jaxon Smith-NjigbaTyrone Tracy
2024-09-22-29%Zamir White, Rashid ShaheedJordan Addison
2024-09-08-24%Chris Godwin, Calvin RidleyRome Odunze
2024-08-15+24%Adam Thielen, 1 3rd2 2nds
2024-06-25+2%Blake Corum
2024-06-06-18%Terry McLaurin, Aaron Rodgers, 1 3rdNico Collins, 1 later pick
2024-05-02-10%Amari Cooper, Kyler Murray, 1 later pickJoe Burrow, Jahan Dotson, 1 2nd

Read each row as: Mark Andrews, plus anything in the third column, was traded for T.J. Hockenson plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Mark Andrews; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 96, the whole-deal value gap runs +19.4% from the side that received Mark Andrews, so the side ending up with Mark Andrews has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Mark Andrews for T.J. Hockenson fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 96 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Mark Andrews trade · Every T.J. Hockenson trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Research · Privacy · Terms