Trade calculators put the bar for a package at about 1.32x. Real dynasty trades clear at 0.85x when an elite player is involved.
Every number here is recomputed when the page loads. Nothing is hardcoded.
| Shape | The single player | Clears at | Middle half | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two for one | Solid starter | 1.22x | 0.81x to 1.79x | 5,517 |
| Two for one | Very good player | 1.05x | 0.76x to 1.21x | 4,153 |
| Two for one | Elite player | 0.85x | 0.69x to 1.04x | 3,174 |
| Three or more for one | Solid starter | 1.46x | 1.00x to 2.19x | 757 |
| Three or more for one | Very good player | 1.17x | 0.85x to 1.55x | 1,237 |
| Three or more for one | Elite player | 0.89x | 0.71x to 1.10x | 2,545 |
Ratio of the package side's total value to the single player's value, priced on the day each trade happened. Medians, not averages. Fit refreshed 2026-07-28.
I price every completed dynasty trade in the corpus at the player values that were current the day it happened. Package-for-one deals get grouped by the tier of the single player, using that snapshot's 95th percentile so a 2022 star and a 2026 star land in the same band.
I throw out the throw-ins, so a bench piece cannot make a two-for-one look like a three-for-one, and no single league can dominate a bucket. Buckets below their sample floor never get published at all.
The 1.32x calculator bar is not my measurement. It is the package premium a public trade calculator asks for, read off its own value-adjustment tool at each tier, where it sits close to flat rather than moving with the player. Treat it as an approximate reading of what calculators ask, and the clearing figures above as the measured part.
Free to cite, link back if you do. To check one specific deal, the trade grader runs your exact trade through this, and is this trade fair? covers what it means in practice.