Read Option

Is Cole Kmet for Kyle Pitts fair?

Cole Kmet and Kyle Pitts have been on opposite sides of 30 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

None of them were a straight one-for-one. Every time these two crossed, something else was attached to close it.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 9 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 9 of those 9 times it was the Cole Kmet side (0 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Kyle Pitts as the more valuable of the two.

30
Deals they were both in
0
Straight up, one for one
9 / 0
One side sweetened: Cole Kmet / Kyle Pitts

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Cole Kmet prices at 16 and Kyle Pitts at 2,700, so the market currently rates Kyle Pitts about 168.8x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Cole Kmet for Kyle Pitts now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Cole KmetWent with Kyle Pitts
2026-07-24+15%Chris Brooks, Colston Loveland, Kyle Williams, 1 moreJared Goff, Colby Parkinson, Tyler Allgeier, 1 1st, 1 2nd
2026-07-02+0%Sam Darnold, Jaylen Waddle, Trey Benson, 16 more, 2 1stsKhalil Shakir, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Devin Singletary, 16 more, 2 later picks
2026-06-05-47%Kayshon Boutte, Dak Prescott, Noah Gray, 17 more, 1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rd, 1 later pickJayden Reed, Brian Robinson, Patrick Mahomes, 9 more, 3 1sts, 1 2nd
2025-09-27-63%Stefon Diggs, Isaiah Likely, Bryce YoungDrake Maye
2025-08-13-24%Jack Bech
2025-07-27-14%Matthew Stafford1 2nd
2025-06-01-34%Najee Harris
2025-05-19-55%Michael Mayer, 1 2ndAdam Thielen, 1 3rd
2025-04-11-25%1 2nd1 3rd
2025-03-19+15%Christian McCaffrey, Tee HigginsSaquon Barkley

Read each row as: Cole Kmet, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Kyle Pitts plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Cole Kmet; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 30, the whole-deal value gap runs -28.5% from the side that received Cole Kmet, so the side ending up with Kyle Pitts has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Cole Kmet for Kyle Pitts fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 30 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Cole Kmet trade · Every Kyle Pitts trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms