Read Option

Is Kyle Pitts for Travis Kelce fair?

Kyle Pitts and Travis Kelce have been on opposite sides of 52 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

Most of those were larger deals with other pieces attached. 6 of them were straight up: Kyle Pitts for Travis Kelce, nothing else changing hands.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 8 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 5 of those 8 times it was the Kyle Pitts side (3 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Travis Kelce as the more valuable of the two.

52
Deals they were both in
6
Straight up, one for one
5 / 3
One side sweetened: Kyle Pitts / Travis Kelce

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Kyle Pitts prices at 2,700 and Travis Kelce at 265, so the market currently rates Kyle Pitts about 10.2x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Kyle Pitts for Travis Kelce now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Kyle PittsWent with Travis Kelce
2025-09-16-22%Blake Corum, Brock Purdy, 1 2ndCaleb Williams, Cooper Kupp
2025-07-06+35%Bo Nix, 1 2ndGeno Smith, Mike Evans, Chase Brown
2025-05-06-40%1 1st, 2 3rdsAlvin Kamara, Garrett Wilson
2024-11-27+88%Bijan Robinson, 1 later pickCalvin Ridley, Jakobi Meyers, Tony Pollard
2024-11-19-1%J.J. McCarthy, Blake Corum, Jermaine Burton, 4 moreDeAndre Hopkins, Keenan Allen, Jared Goff, 3 more
2024-10-19-1%Blake Corum, Rashod Bateman, Sam Howell, 1 more, 1 1stEvan Engram, Aaron Jones, Rhamondre Stevenson, 1 more, 1 3rd
2024-10-08+52%
2023-10-21+38%Justin FieldsMatthew Stafford
2023-10-18-91%Jerry Jeudy, Elijah Moore, Treylon Burks, 2 more, 1 1st, 1 2nd, 2 3rds, 1 later pickStefon Diggs, Terry McLaurin, Tony Pollard, 1 more
2023-10-05-34%2 2nds

Read each row as: Kyle Pitts, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Travis Kelce plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Kyle Pitts; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 52, the whole-deal value gap runs +2.4% from the side that received Kyle Pitts - close to even. Read that as a measure of the entire trade, every piece included, not of these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Kyle Pitts for Travis Kelce fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 52 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Kyle Pitts trade · Every Travis Kelce trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms