Read Option

Is Dalton Schultz for Kyle Pitts fair?

Dalton Schultz and Kyle Pitts have been on opposite sides of 29 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

None of them were a straight one-for-one. Every time these two crossed, something else was attached to close it.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 11 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 11 of those 11 times it was the Dalton Schultz side (0 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Kyle Pitts as the more valuable of the two.

29
Deals they were both in
0
Straight up, one for one
11 / 0
One side sweetened: Dalton Schultz / Kyle Pitts

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Dalton Schultz prices at 111 and Kyle Pitts at 2,700, so the market currently rates Kyle Pitts about 24.3x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Dalton Schultz for Kyle Pitts now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Dalton SchultzWent with Kyle Pitts
2025-10-11-128%1 3rd1 later pick
2025-08-15-56%1 2nd, 2 later picks
2025-06-12-9%Elijah Arroyo, De'Von AchaneJonathan Taylor
2025-06-03-3%Jameson WilliamsMichael Pittman, Najee Harris
2025-05-11+68%1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rdD'Andre Swift
2024-11-03+43%Patrick MahomesKirk Cousins, Michael Pittman
2024-09-11+2%Devaughn Vele, Christian McCaffreyQuentin Johnston, 1 1st
2024-05-01+37%Curtis Samuel, 1 1st
2024-03-03-6%Russell Wilson, CeeDee LambJustin Herbert, 1 3rd
2023-11-30-76%1 2nd

Read each row as: Dalton Schultz, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Kyle Pitts plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Dalton Schultz; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 29, the whole-deal value gap runs -16.7% from the side that received Dalton Schultz, so the side ending up with Kyle Pitts has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Dalton Schultz for Kyle Pitts fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 29 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Dalton Schultz trade · Every Kyle Pitts trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms