Read Option

Is Evan Engram for Kyle Pitts fair?

Evan Engram and Kyle Pitts have been on opposite sides of 34 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

None of them were a straight one-for-one. Every time these two crossed, something else was attached to close it.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 4 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 4 of those 4 times it was the Evan Engram side (0 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Kyle Pitts as the more valuable of the two.

34
Deals they were both in
0
Straight up, one for one
4 / 0
One side sweetened: Evan Engram / Kyle Pitts

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Evan Engram prices at 14 and Kyle Pitts at 2,700, so the market currently rates Kyle Pitts about 192.9x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Evan Engram for Kyle Pitts now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Evan EngramWent with Kyle Pitts
2025-12-10+18%Daniel Jones, 1 1stKimani Vidal, Brock Purdy
2025-10-11-2%Calvin Ridley, A.J. Brown, Jordan MasonQuinshon Judkins
2025-09-18+89%Colston Loveland, A.J. BrownTyler Warren
2025-07-28+47%Derrick Henry, Christian McCaffrey, Chris GodwinCedric Tillman, Ricky Pearsall, TreVeyon Henderson, 1 more
2025-07-05+48%Tony Pollard, 1 3rdBlake Corum, 1 2nd
2025-05-07+17%Jared Goff, Baker Mayfield, Kyle Trask, 1 moreBo Nix, J.J. McCarthy, 1 1st, 1 2nd
2025-05-06-21%Geno Smith, Chris Godwin1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rd, 1 later pick
2024-11-19+1%DeAndre Hopkins, Travis Kelce, Keenan Allen, 3 moreJ.J. McCarthy, Blake Corum, Jermaine Burton, 4 more
2024-10-19+1%Travis Kelce, Aaron Jones, Rhamondre Stevenson, 1 more, 1 3rdBlake Corum, Rashod Bateman, Sam Howell, 1 more, 1 1st
2024-10-12-7%James Conner, David MontgomeryBucky Irving, Luke McCaffrey, Darnell Mooney

Read each row as: Evan Engram, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Kyle Pitts plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Evan Engram; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 34, the whole-deal value gap runs -1.6% from the side that received Evan Engram - close to even. Read that as a measure of the entire trade, every piece included, not of these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Evan Engram for Kyle Pitts fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 34 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Evan Engram trade · Every Kyle Pitts trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms