Read Option

Is Evan Engram for Mark Andrews fair?

Evan Engram and Mark Andrews have been on opposite sides of 33 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

Most of those were larger deals with other pieces attached. 1 of them were straight up: Evan Engram for Mark Andrews, nothing else changing hands.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 6 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 4 of those 6 times it was the Evan Engram side (2 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Mark Andrews as the more valuable of the two.

33
Deals they were both in
1
Straight up, one for one
4 / 2
One side sweetened: Evan Engram / Mark Andrews

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Evan Engram prices at 14 and Mark Andrews at 407, so the market currently rates Mark Andrews about 29.1x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Evan Engram for Mark Andrews now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Evan EngramWent with Mark Andrews
2026-06-22+45%MarShawn Lloyd, Tyrone Tracy, Jordan James, 9 more, 1 2ndChris Rodriguez, Omarion Hampton, Tyreek Hill, 6 more, 1 1st, 1 2nd
2026-04-20+52%1 2nd1 3rd
2026-03-25+110%
2025-11-27-33%Michael Wilson1 3rd, 2 later picks
2025-09-05-11%1 2ndArian Smith, 1 3rd
2025-08-06-70%1 1stTyrone Tracy
2025-07-09-49%1 later pickRico Dowdle
2025-06-03-1%Garrett Wilson, Brock PurdyJared Goff, Isaiah Likely, Jaxon Smith-Njigba
2025-05-17-48%1 2ndChristian Kirk
2025-03-31-43%

Read each row as: Evan Engram, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Mark Andrews plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Evan Engram; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 33, the whole-deal value gap runs -16.3% from the side that received Evan Engram, so the side ending up with Mark Andrews has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Evan Engram for Mark Andrews fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 33 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Evan Engram trade · Every Mark Andrews trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms