Read Option

Is Jake Ferguson for Mark Andrews fair?

Jake Ferguson and Mark Andrews have been on opposite sides of 28 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

None of them were a straight one-for-one. Every time these two crossed, something else was attached to close it.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 4 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 4 of those 4 times it was the Jake Ferguson side (0 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Mark Andrews as the more valuable of the two.

28
Deals they were both in
0
Straight up, one for one
4 / 0
One side sweetened: Jake Ferguson / Mark Andrews

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Jake Ferguson prices at 978 and Mark Andrews at 407, so the market currently rates Jake Ferguson about 2.4x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Jake Ferguson for Mark Andrews now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Jake FergusonWent with Mark Andrews
2025-11-02+47%Jalen CokerRico Dowdle
2025-10-28+81%Kenneth WalkerRhamondre Stevenson, 1 2nd
2025-05-18-0%DJ Giddens, Jonathan Taylor, Jordan AddisonBraelon Allen, Jayden Higgins, Breece Hall
2025-04-15-45%Courtland Sutton, Tyler AllgeierDavid Montgomery
2025-03-17-60%1 2nd, 1 3rd, 1 later pick
2025-01-10-57%Audric Estime, Romeo DoubsKirk Cousins, 1 later pick
2024-11-27+30%Wan'Dale RobinsonJuwan Johnson
2024-11-16-27%Erick All, Josh Downs, Quentin JohnstonAJ Barner, Demarcus Robinson, Calvin Ridley, 1 more
2024-10-23+33%Zack Moss, Puka NacuaChris Godwin, Javonte Williams, 1 2nd
2024-10-08-51%Miles Sanders, 1 3rdErick All, 1 2nd

Read each row as: Jake Ferguson, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Mark Andrews plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Jake Ferguson; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 28, the whole-deal value gap runs -36.7% from the side that received Jake Ferguson, so the side ending up with Mark Andrews has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Jake Ferguson for Mark Andrews fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 28 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Jake Ferguson trade · Every Mark Andrews trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms