Read Option

Is Mark Andrews for Noah Fant fair?

Mark Andrews and Noah Fant have been on opposite sides of 29 real dynasty trades.

Not simulations and not a calculator lining up two numbers. Every one of them is a completed trade from a public Sleeper league, graded at the player values that were current on the day it happened.

None of them were a straight one-for-one. Every time these two crossed, something else was attached to close it.

This is the part a calculator cannot tell you. In 9 of these deals exactly one side had to attach something extra, and 8 of those 9 times it was the Noah Fant side (1 the other way). The side that keeps having to add is the side holding the lesser asset, so the market has been treating Mark Andrews as the more valuable of the two.

29
Deals they were both in
0
Straight up, one for one
1 / 8
One side sweetened: Mark Andrews / Noah Fant

What they cost today

Everything above is priced on the day each deal happened, which is the only honest way to grade a completed trade. It is not what they cost now. Today Mark Andrews prices at 407 and Noah Fant at 3, so the market currently rates Mark Andrews about 135.7x the other. A pair can lean one way across its history and price the opposite way now; that gap is the whole reason to check the deal in front of you rather than the deal someone made in 2023.

Values as of 2026-07-24.

Grade Mark Andrews for Noah Fant now Scout your league

The deals themselves

DateMarginWent with Mark AndrewsWent with Noah Fant
2025-09-18+146%Najee HarrisWan'Dale Robinson
2025-09-01-57%Malik WashingtonJa'Tavion Sanders, Devin Neal, 1 1st, 1 3rd
2024-11-26-83%Darnell Mooney, Bryce YoungDak Prescott, Zack Moss, 1 3rd
2024-09-20-14%Tank Dell, 1 2ndRashee Rice, 1 1st
2023-10-03+14%Alvin Kamara, James CookJahan Dotson, Quentin Johnston, 1 1st, 2 2nds
2023-09-28+69%Justice Hill, 1 1st
2023-09-05+60%1 1st, 1 2nd, 1 3rd
2023-05-17+11%1 1st, 1 2nd
2022-11-15+68%1 1st, 1 2nd
2022-11-11+14%Robert Woods, Derek Carr, Alvin Kamara, 1 moreDaniel Jones, Tee Higgins, Van Jefferson, 1 more, 1 3rd

Read each row as: Mark Andrews, plus anything in the third column, was traded for Noah Fant plus anything in the fourth. An em dash means that side sent nobody else. Margin is the value gap at that day’s prices from the side that received Mark Andrews; positive means that side came out ahead.

The whole-deal margin

Across all 29, the whole-deal value gap runs +24.4% from the side that received Mark Andrews, so the side ending up with Mark Andrews has generally come out ahead on face value. That measures the entire trade, every piece included, not these two players against each other.

Why this beats a calculator on this exact question

A calculator answers “is Mark Andrews for Noah Fant fair” by subtracting one number from another, and it gives every manager in your league the same answer. That tells you nothing about whether the trade closes. What closes it is whether one side has to attach a piece, and which side that usually is. The 29 deals above are the record of what leagues actually agreed to when these two were on the table together.

How trade fairness actually works →

Full trade histories

Every Mark Andrews trade · Every Noah Fant trade

Other matchups for these two

All players with real trade data →

Values from DynastyProcess and nflverse. Trades from public Sleeper leagues. When the data will not support a fair grade I leave it out and say so. Is this trade fair? · All players · Privacy · Terms